Features and comparisons
Mapboard GIS is difficult to measure against other field data-capture applications, because it takes a totally different view of itse task. As its full name implies, Mapboard relies on a sophisticated spatial engine, but it is not a "geographical information system" in the traditional sense.
In the spirit of its namesake tool, Mapboard GIS prioritizes a natural and intuitive human interface for map editing over a fully realized set of tools. It does not include precision GIS features such as point-based editing operations. However, it has novel tools geared to stylus editing, such as erasing and reshaping features. It also has path-breaking iterative topology capabilities.
Mapboard GIS is cheifly focused on line and polygon data. There are already many apps that support field sampling and measurement collection. It is best used alongside an app like FieldMove, StraboSpot, Rockd, or another tool for capturing point data.
Right now, there is no way to see collected point data in Mapboard GIS. We will work towards deepening integrations with outside platforms for point data in a later iteration of the app.
In order to function as a workable mapping application, Mapboard GIS supports a standard set of baseline capabilities:
- Creation and editing of point and polygon features
- User-created data types
- Management of basemaps, including
- Spatialite (onboard) and PostGIS (networked) database support
Comparisons with other applications
If you want a fully featured GIS system for iPad specifically, check out TouchGIS, which is capable but expensive ($299/year). Its editing tools are simpler than desktop GIS systems but still geared towards precision over speed. It lacks the natural drawing capabilities of Mapboard GIS, but it has a lot of advanced capabilities that are out-of-scope for this app (such as managing large collections of arbitrary layers and feature collection forms).
The editing capabilities of pen-centric apps such as Procreate and GoodNotes serve as inspirations for Mapboard GIS. These applications are (obviously) not mapping tools, but they serve as aspirational models for how a tablet user interface should recede to the background behind strong pen- and touch-based editing and simple tools.